Market Perspectives May 2024
As pessimism sets in on the pace of rate cuts, find out our latest views on global themes, trends and events influencing investors.
Fixed Income
03 May 2024
Michel Vernier, CFA, London UK, Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Please note: This article is more technical in nature than our typical articles, and may require some background knowledge and experience in investing to understand the themes that we explore below.
All data referenced in this article are sourced from Bloomberg unless otherwise stated, and is accurate at the time of publishing.
The rate market remains volatile and term premium at the long end of the yield curve could cause further volatility. However, higher term premium should not always be associated with higher yields.
Historically, various factors initiated and contributed to rate sell-offs. The front end of the yield curve seems to be the biggest driver typically, as witnessed between September 2021 and October 2022: US 10-year yields surged from around 1.3% to 4.3% (+300 basis points, bp) primarily driven by higher US 2-year yields (+400bp).
By contrast, the rate sell-off witnessed during the third quarter of 2023 was less driven by the short end but by the long end of the curve: the US 10-year yield rose from 3.7% to just above 5% in between July and October. Global bond investors attributed the move to the rise of the so-called term premium.
According to prior US central bank president Ben Bernanke the term premium is the extra return that lenders demand to hold a longer-term bond instead of investing in a series of short term-term securities (for instance, a one time investment in a 10-year bonds versus five times into two-year bonds).
The trend in the term premium largely coincides with the trend of the curve slope which is the difference between a 10-year bond and a 2-year bond, for example. However, it is different in nature. The term premium is a theoretical construct and the two most popular models used to extract this premium from a risk-free neutral rate are the Adrian, Crump and Moench (ACM) model and the Kim and Wright (KW) model.
The term premium embedded in the US 10-year yield rose by around 150bp during the third quarter of last year. Bond investors demanded a higher premium due to concerns around a widening in the US fiscal deficit and the country’s exuberant debt levels.
The fiscal deficit reached $1.6 trillion in the year to April 20241, from $1.38 trillion the year before, adding to the $34 trillion of publicly held debt. At the end of this fiscal year, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) anticipated that the debt will equate to 100% of US gross domestic product. In other words, higher than at any time since the second World War with the expectation for the ratio to increase to over 115% by 2034, according to the CBO.
Higher tax revenues and a more resilient US economy mean the immediate fiscal deficit, as well as the Treasury supply, may not be as high as initially feared, but it is still worryingly high.
As pointed out before, higher deficits do not necessarily translate into higher yields. This is because governments historically took on extraordinary debt during phases of crisis or recessions. And in these situations (like seen during the global financial crisis of 2007-2009, or the COVID-19 pandemic) fiscal accommodation is met with monetary accommodation.
For instance, during the pandemic the US Federal Reserve (Fed) slashed policy rates by 225bp and absorbed almost three trillion dollars of US Treasury bills and bonds in its System 0pen Market Account (SOMA) portfolio (see chart).
Comparison of the term premium with US 10-year Treasuries and the US Treasury surplus/deficit and the fed funds rate against the Fed’s SOMA account Treasury notes and bonds
Upward pressure as a result of higher leverage and bond supply could materialise as observed in 2013 (or the so-called ‘Taper tantrum’ when the Fed shocked financial markets by announcing a reduction of Treasury purchases), or in 2016 (as President Donald Trump unveiled debt-fuelled growth measures).
In its recent report “Fiscal Policy in the Great Election Year” the International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that a one percentage point increase in the US primary deficit is associated with an 11 basis point rise in the respective term premium2 (see chart).
Taking a closer look at the relationship between the Adrian Crump and Moench US 10-year term premium estimate
In the same report the IMF pointed to the US and China as the main drivers for global debt to reach 99% to GDP by 2029. Legacy fiscal measures from the pandemic crisis, population ageing, and climate change are some of the adverse factors cited. In addition, the risk of fiscal slippage appears to be larger during election years (elections are hardly won with austerity measures), according to the IMF. So higher term premium could be on the horizon.
But while higher term premium can lead to higher rates on the long end, this is usually only a temporary phenomenon. The more dominating dynamic behind a rise in term premium is the classical so called ‘bull curve’ steepening; at times when the Fed cut rates while the long end does not mirror the move (see chart). Interestingly, during such times, overall yield levels drop sharply.
Comparison of US 10-year yields with the calculated term premium indicates the link between a falling term premium and spread between the 10-year and 2-year Treasuries
The latest rise in yields was not caused by a rise in term premium but further fiscal slippage and bond supply concerns could likely lead to a renewed rise in term premium and higher rates on an absolute measure. However, such a dynamic in the bond market would probably be more temporary in nature.
A higher term premium does not always translate into significantly higher rates that persist for an extended period. This is because ultimately it is the path of policy rates and cycles which are likely to remain the dominant driver for yields. Less discount does not necessarily mean higher yields over the long term. Higher volatility may provide an opportunity to take on duration.
As pessimism sets in on the pace of rate cuts, find out our latest views on global themes, trends and events influencing investors.
This communication is general in nature and provided for information/educational purposes only. It does not take into account any specific investment objectives, the financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. It not intended for distribution, publication, or use in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be unlawful, nor is it aimed at any person or entity to whom it would be unlawful for them to access.
This communication has been prepared by Barclays Private Bank (Barclays) and references to Barclays includes any entity within the Barclays group of companies.
This communication:
(i) is not research nor a product of the Barclays Research department. Any views expressed in these materials may differ from those of the Barclays Research department. All opinions and estimates are given as of the date of the materials and are subject to change. Barclays is not obliged to inform recipients of these materials of any change to such opinions or estimates;
(ii) is not an offer, an invitation or a recommendation to enter into any product or service and does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities, investment advice or a personal recommendation;
(iii) is confidential and no part may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted without the prior written permission of Barclays; and
(iv) has not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority.
Any past or simulated past performance including back-testing, modelling or scenario analysis, or future projections contained in this communication is no indication as to future performance. No representation is made as to the accuracy of the assumptions made in this communication, or completeness of, any modelling, scenario analysis or back-testing. The value of any investment may also fluctuate as a result of market changes.
Where information in this communication has been obtained from third party sources, we believe those sources to be reliable but we do not guarantee the information’s accuracy and you should note that it may be incomplete or condensed.
Neither Barclays nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives or agents, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this communication or its contents or reliance on the information contained herein, except to the extent this would be prohibited by law or regulation.